I found that distinctly insulting on behalf of the women who are nice.
She went onto say that women like that won't be successful at work and get trampled on. That they are socially trained to behave in a manner that isn't truly female. I admit this is partially true but my belief that has to do with unconfident women that feel they need to be submissive.
I thought the term (it was in Finnish) was... let's say wrong.
It is generally not used outside of Feminist discourse. And feminism is strong in Finland.
There is nothing wrong with a woman in power.
But I think Finns might be taking it a bit far (or at least the older generation and some of mine).
They see the "feminine" as weak. Nurturing, caring, and other characteristics.
I think that these characteristics generally occure naturally in women (hormones, genes etc). I believe it is both a strength and weakness.
We exist in dualities. There is male and female, black and white, love and hated, etc etc.
Neither is better or worse than the other.
I think it is truly sad that there are women out there that do not glory in being female.
There is strength in being Female, it is not always the same as Male but both can be used to get ahead in life.
Work life is highlighted in Finland as being incredibly important, and that Feminine characteristics do not let you get ahead in that field, ergo belittling them.
However I believe a truly confident woman, who has embraced her duality can be successful as well.
And also thinking on this, will that woman be truly happy suppressing her feminine side and bringing the masculine side to the fore even though it makes her successful business?
I don't know...
What do you think?
My reply: http://dorianpula.ca/2009/04/echo-good-little-girl-syndromeecho-good-little-girl-syndrome/
ReplyDelete